By the end of this lesson, you will learn:
- how value-based, competitive, cost-based, and penetration pricing work, and when a business might choose each one;
- how market conditions — such as supply-chain shortages, inflation, recession, competition, and price elasticity of demand — increase or limit a business's pricing power;
- which legal constraints (laws against price fixing, price gouging, price discrimination and predatory pricing) limit how businesses set prices;
- how to use AP task verbs to answer exam-style multiple-choice and free-response questions about pricing;
- how to write a pricing strategy hypothesis for your Business Canvas Project.
Warm Up: Which Bar Wins Your Dollar?
5 minThree chocolate bars sit at the checkout. You can buy exactly one. Tap your pick.
Did You Know? (tap to flip)
Pricing Strategy Sort
7 minBusinesses don't pick prices out of a hat. Here are four common pricing strategies:
Value-based
Price is set by what customers believe the product is worth — brand, quality, exclusivity, experience.
Competitive
Price is set at, slightly above, or slightly below what competitors charge for similar products.
Cost-based
Start with the per-unit cost, then add the profit you want on each unit. Per-unit cost + desired per-unit profit = price. Common when costs are clear, like custom orders.
Penetration
Launch with a low price to attract customers away from established rivals and grab market share fast.
Stuck? Watch a 1-minute explainer: Four Pricing Strategies
Match each chocolate product to its strategy
The Cocoa Crunch: Who Has Pricing Power?
8 minPricing power is a business's ability to raise prices without losing too many customers. Market conditions can give a business more of it — or take it away. A key idea: price elasticity of demand. If customers buy a lot less when the price goes up, demand is elastic (pricing power is low). If they keep buying anyway, demand is inelastic (pricing power is high).
Stuck? Watch a 1-minute explainer: Pricing Power and Elasticity
Price Your Bar Lab
15 minYou're the marketing manager for a new small-batch chocolate bar. The main competitor sells a similar bar for $3.00. Choose your customer and strategy, set your price, and watch how demand and profit respond. Different customer segments react to price differently!
Business Dashboard
⚡ Cocoa Shock!
A bad harvest doubles your cocoa cost overnight — a supply-chain market condition. How will you respond?
Stuck? Watch a 1-minute explainer: Contribution Margin and Break-Even
The Legal Line
5 minBusinesses have a lot of freedom to set prices, but that freedom has limits. Laws protect fair competition and consumers:
- Price fixing: competitors may not secretly agree to set prices.
- Predatory pricing: a business may not price below cost to drive rivals out of business.
- Price gouging: sellers may not raise prices because demand jumped during a crisis, such as a natural disaster (illegal in many states).
- Price discrimination: a business may not charge different prices for the same product based on race, nationality, sex or another protected status.
Remember: a high price is not automatically illegal! Discounts for groups like students can be legal. Pricing based on a protected status is not.
Stuck? Watch a 1-minute explainer: Legal Limits on Pricing
Exit Ticket
5 minAnswer all five questions on your own, then check your work.
AP Exam Practice
25 min · next class or homeworkNow practice the way the AP Exam asks. These questions follow the College Board sample questions in the course and exam description. There's a multiple-choice set built around a scenario and a figure, a Business Concept Application free-response question (FRQ 3 on the exam) and a practice version of the Business Decision free-response question (FRQ 4 on the exam).
Need help? Watch a short explainer on reading task verbs
Know Your Task Verbs
- Identify
- Indicate or provide information about a specified topic, without elaboration or explanation.
- Describe
- Provide the relevant characteristics of a specific topic or concept.
- Explain
- Provide information about how or why a relationship, process, pattern, position, situation, or outcome occurs, using evidence and/or reasoning to support or qualify a claim.
- Compare
- Provide a description of similarities and/or differences.
- Recommend
- Articulate a course of action and support it with evidence.
- Pitch
- Describe the product, the target customer, the problem, need, or want the product is intended to address; and explain how the product creates value for customers.
Definitions quoted from the AP Business with Personal Finance Course and Exam Description (College Board), “Task Verbs Used in Free-Response Questions.” Task verbs are highlighted in the prompts below.
Multiple Choice
Questions 1 through 4 refer to the following.
Bean & Blossom Chocolate (B&B) is a startup that makes dark chocolate bars from ethically sourced cocoa. B&B plans to sell its bars at specialty grocers next to several established brands. To attract customers away from those brands quickly, B&B will launch its bar at $2.50. It plans to raise the price to $3.50 once it reaches its market share goal.
A survey of shoppers in B&B’s target market found that 70% would switch to a different brand if the price of their usual chocolate bar rose by $0.50. The figure shows the prices and per-unit costs of B&B’s planned bar and three rival bars.
| Brand | Price | Per-unit cost |
|---|---|---|
| B&B (launch price) | $2.50 | $2.10 |
| Choco Royale | $3.25 | $1.85 |
| SweetCo | $2.99 | $1.60 |
| Value Bar | $1.49 | $0.95 |
Free Response: Business Concept Application 3 points
Peak Cocoa sells a milk chocolate bar in supermarkets. Rival bars in the candy aisle are very similar and are priced between $2.29 and $2.99. Peak Cocoa’s goal is to increase weekly revenue without losing customers to these rivals.
The marketing team ran a three-week in-store price test. Three similar stores each sold the bar at a different price, and the team recorded weekly sales at each store. The team also reviewed an industry report showing that cocoa costs rose sharply over the past year. The figure shows the results of the price test.
| Store | Test price | Bars sold per week | Weekly revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Store 1 | $2.49 | 600 | $1,494.00 |
| Store 2 | $2.99 | 540 | $1,614.60 |
| Store 3 | $3.49 | 300 | $1,047.00 |
Respond to parts A, B, and C.
Check against the scoring guidelines (1 point)
Examples that earn this point:
- Peak Cocoa conducted primary research by running an in-store price test, selling the bar at three different prices in three similar stores and recording weekly sales.
- Peak Cocoa ran an experiment that tested how customers responded to different prices.
- Peak Cocoa used secondary research when it reviewed an industry report on cocoa costs.
Does not earn credit: Naming a method with no detail from the scenario (for example, “they did research”), or naming a method that doesn't appear in the scenario, such as a focus group.
Check against the scoring guidelines (1 point)
Examples that earn this point:
- At $2.99, the bar generated the highest weekly revenue, $1,614.60.
- When the price rose from $2.99 to $3.49, weekly sales fell from 540 to 300 bars, nearly cutting sales in half.
- Raising the price from $2.49 to $2.99 reduced sales only slightly, from 600 to 540 bars, but increased revenue.
- Cocoa costs rose sharply over the past year, according to the industry report.
Does not earn credit: A finding with no data or detail from the scenario (for example, “price matters to customers”).
Check against the scoring guidelines (1 point)
Examples that earn this point:
- Because $2.99 produced the most revenue and is still within rivals' $2.29–$2.99 range, Peak Cocoa could use competitive pricing at $2.99 to increase weekly revenue without losing customers to rivals.
- Sales dropped sharply at $3.49, which shows customers are highly price sensitive above $2.99. Peak Cocoa should avoid that price, because it would push customers to rival bars and lower revenue and market share.
- Because cocoa costs are rising but customers respond strongly to price, Peak Cocoa has limited pricing power. It could raise its price only to $2.99 and look for other ways to cut per-unit costs to protect profit.
Does not earn credit: Restating a finding without connecting it to a goal, or naming a goal without explaining how the finding helps reach it (no “because” or “which leads to” link).
Free Response: Business Decision (practice version) 6 points
You have been hired as a consultant to help the business described in the scenario decide between two possible courses of action.
One year after launch, Bean & Blossom Chocolate (B&B) reached its market share goal and now sells its 3.0-ounce bar for $3.50. B&B sells about 1,000 bars per week. Its brand is built on ethically sourced cocoa and honest labeling, and loyal customers often recommend the brand online.
After poor cocoa harvests in West Africa, B&B’s per-unit cost for the 3.0-ounce bar rose from $2.10 to $2.80. A customer survey found that 62% of B&B customers check package size when they shop. It also found that 70% would feel “misled” if a brand made a product smaller without telling them.
Option 1: Raise the price. Keep the 3.0-ounce bar and raise the price to $3.99.
Option 2: Shrink the bar. Keep the $3.50 price and reduce the bar to 2.6 ounces. This uses less cocoa, so the per-unit cost falls to $2.45. Projected sales assume most customers will not notice the change.
| Option | Price | Per-unit cost | Per-unit profit | Projected bars sold per week | Projected weekly profit (before fixed costs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1: Raise the price | $3.99 | $2.80 | $1.19 | 800 | $952.00 |
| 2: Shrink the bar | $3.50 | $2.45 | $1.05 | 950 | $997.50 |
Respond to parts A, B, and C.
Check against the scoring guidelines (2 points)
i. Describe a factor (1 point)
Examples that earn this point:
- Poor cocoa harvests in West Africa (an external, supply-chain factor) raised B&B's per-unit cost from $2.10 to $2.80.
- B&B's customers are attentive shoppers: 62% check package size.
ii. Explain how it creates an opportunity or a problem (1 point)
Examples that earn this point:
- The cocoa shortage is a problem because it cuts B&B's per-unit profit from $1.40 to $0.70 at the current price. B&B has to raise its price, reduce its costs or accept much lower profit.
- Because so many customers check package size, shrinking the bar is a problem. Customers are likely to notice, which could hurt the trust B&B's brand depends on.
Does not earn credit: Naming a factor without scenario evidence, or describing the factor again in part ii without explaining its effect on B&B.
Check against the scoring guidelines (2 points)
i. Financial criterion (1 point)
Examples that earn this point:
- Option 2 has a higher projected weekly profit ($997.50) than Option 1 ($952.00), a difference of $45.50 per week.
- Both options are projected to stay profitable, earning $952.00 and $997.50 per week before fixed costs.
ii. Nonfinancial criterion (1 point)
Examples that earn this point:
- Customer trust and brand reputation: Option 1 keeps B&B's honest-labeling promise by openly raising the price. Option 2 risks the 70% of customers who would feel misled by a smaller bar.
- Customer loyalty: under Option 1, some price-sensitive customers may leave (sales are projected to drop to 800). Under Option 2, loyal customers who notice the smaller bar may stop recommending B&B online.
Does not earn credit: A comparison that uses evidence for only one option, or a nonfinancial criterion that isn't connected to the scenario.
Check against the scoring guidelines (2 points)
Recommend and explain (1 point)
Examples that earn this point:
- I recommend Option 1. Raising the price openly protects the honest brand that B&B's loyal customers value, which matters more in the long run than a small short-term profit difference.
- I recommend Option 2. It earns more profit each week while keeping the price customers are used to, which protects B&B's market share.
Support with two criteria and evidence (1 point)
Examples that earn this point:
- Option 1: Although it earns $45.50 less per week ($952.00 vs. $997.50), it avoids misleading the 70% of customers who would feel misled by a smaller bar. That protects the trust and online recommendations B&B's brand depends on.
- Option 2: It earns $997.50 per week instead of $952.00, and keeping the $3.50 price avoids losing about 200 price-sensitive customers each week. B&B could reduce trust risk by clearly labeling the new size.
Does not earn credit: Recommending both options or neither (“it depends”), or a recommendation without evidence from the scenario for each criterion.
Connect to Your Business Canvas Project
3 minPrice and pricing strategy is a Business Canvas Project element that requires hypothesis testing. Use today's thinking to draft a first pricing strategy hypothesis for your own product.
Turn in your work
Click the button to collect all your answers. Then copy and paste them into your class assignment, or print / save as PDF.